Skip to main content

Tuttminx

Concept

The Tuttminx, desinged by Lee Tutt in 2005 and mass-produced by Verypuzzle 6 years later. Verypuzzle has made 3 designs so far, each one getting rid of a particular issue.
The idea and geometric design of the shape can me simply put: it's the extension of a dodecahedron to a truncated icosahedron. (Maybe a bit easier: it's a football).
Its surface consists of 12 pentagons and 20 hexagons, which makes 32 sides in total. But despite this massive amount of sides to wrap your head around, the puzzle isn't actually that hard compared to other puzzles which may seem easier at the start.
It's a non-jumbling puzzle, which means that every piece lands into a spot it's supposed to land into, it doesn't get out of orbit (although I find this term rather deceptive). The previous versions of the Verypuzzle production were able to jumble, although this was never intended. Their last design got rid of this problem, altough it's still possible with the right (rather loose) tensions.

Personal experience

The DIY Kit

I bought the DIY kit and I've got to say, it's was an interesting experience. Some days I could pull my hair out because of frustration, other days I couldn't stop because how much fun it was. Seeing the puzzle grow while I put it slowly but surely together was something I won't forget soon. I'll definitely get more DIY puzzle kits whenever I can. The only thing I was a bit insecure of was the color scheme. I found that deciding 32 colors out of the 40 (I believe) they sent, and choosing where to place them on the puzzle, was a responsibility I didn't prepare myself for. I'm a perfectionist when it comes to such (irrelevant?) things. Placing stickers is no problem, but choosing the colors was the most difficult part in the whole process. But after all, it turned out great and I couldn't have expected it to be better.

Solving experience

My first thought when I had a 32-sided puzzle in my hands was: 'what was I thinking?'. Nevertheless, I scrambled it (which took me quite a while actually), making sure I wasn't turning too brute so none of my work wouldn't be for nothing. Then I sat down with a cup of coffee and a head full of thoughts. Actually, now that I'm reliving that particular evening, I don't think that I ever took a new puzzle that seriously. Maybe because this was my first really challenging looking puzzle (many more to come!).

Anyway, I was thinking about how to approach this. After all, I didn't try some commutators or designed some algorithms before I dived into the scramble. I started on a pentagonal face, probably because I was thinking to approach it like a Megaminx, but I soon found out that that wasn't that easy after all. After I placed the first few pieces, I was starting to realize that this wouldn't be a walk in the park.
Nevertheless, with some standard commutators and cycling pieces around, I soon got the the last layer and edges. This was a bit trickier, but I could manage to do it anyway.
I thought I had encountered a parity issue during my third solve but I was not sure why it had happened. Convinced in the math which says it's absolutely impossible to have parity problems on a Tuttminx, I started looking around to see what could be wrong. It turned out it was just a simple 3-cycle.
My first solve took me about 2 hours, which was less than I expected from such a monstrous looking puzzle. My first feeling was disappointment. Maybe I got my hopes up high during the assembly, thinking I would be challenged for days. Nevertheless, I enjoyed every bit of the solve and the next day, it was scrambled again!

The Tuttminx wasn't as hard as I was expecting, but that doesn't mean that it isn't a wonderful puzzle! It's a puzzle I often scramble, which means a lot, I suppose. It has a beautiful look while it's scrambled, all the different colors on a rather unusual geometric shape, something I a person as myself can admire.


Source: http://twistypuzzles.com/
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The AI method - Gigaminx Tutorial

Introduction The Gigaminx is a great puzzle to solve, especially if it's a well-turning puzzle. Nevertheless, the solve of the Gigaminx, Teraminx etc. can get boring after a while. It consists of 12 centers which need to be reduced, each in the same way. Same story for the 30 edges. This is still reasonable on the Gigaminx, but can get tedious on higher order minx-puzzles. This tutorial might get rid of your daily searches for fun in the solving experience of puzzles of this kind. There are 2 thing I assume you know when you start this exciting adventure: you're able to solve a Megaminx and you're familiar with the AI reduction method. If the latter sounds foreign to you, you might want to consider checking out this  article which explains this approach on a 4x4, or you can consult my 4x4 AI tutorial . Approach Reducing a 5x5 to a 3x3 with the AI method is no different than reducing a 4x4 to a 2x2. The only difference lies within the edges. Therefore, redu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Axis Cube

Concept The Axis Cube (or Axel Cube) is a modification of a standard cubic 3x3. The way it's designed can be deduced from its looks and the correlation to a 3x3, but can be pretty tricky to people who see this for the first time. In short: it comes down to rotating the cube by 60°, cutting the faces and extending them to make the puzzle cubic again. With this in mind, you can easily see that this is just a shape modification of a 3x3 and is solved in exactly the same way. The concept was first introduced by Adam G. Cowan (the same person who designed the Ghost Cube in 2008). Solving Method Since this is essentially a shape mod of a standard 3x3, the way to solve it is exactly the same. Every method which is used to solve the 3x3 can be applied to the Axis Cube. But there are some difficulties. One way to approach the 3x3 is solving it layer by layer, working your way from bottom to top. This is, in my opinion, the easiest way to solve the Axis Cube as well. Speedc...
Post a Comment
Read more